![]() ![]() ![]() So here’s the dilemma: Microsoft could never deliver such an “incomplete” solution to their customers, because their reputation (and their cost basis for the support hotline) are on the line.ĭropbox, on the other hand, can just push ahead and deliver a solution that adds value but will not always work. If you send me several files then I will have to manually remember several storage locations.Keeping track of the URLs that you have sent me so I can retrieve the files later on.Think of how often you have had that happen with forwarded emails. Forwarding mishaps, where you may have forwarded the link to a third party, who now has access to the file, but I really didn’t mean for that to happen.And where I naively expect you to see the new version. Versioning mishaps, where you have an old link and I have created a new version in the meantime.The reason is simple: This type of file-sharing will not always work and can get users into all sorts of quandaries, among them: Now that’s kind of a low blow.īecause Microsoft would not be able to deliver this type of minimal solution even if they tried. because they sit behind a corporate firewall).įast Company is even taking Microsoft and others to task for not coming up with this seemingly and elegant solution. for sharing with people who don’t use Dropbox (e.g.ad-hoc sharing (where I don’t want to go through the trouble of setting up a shared Dropbox folder). ![]() Which looks like it could be quite valuable for: So now the folks at TechCrunch and Fast Company are positively giddy over Dropbox announcing the ability to share files via links, by passing a unique URL to your intended recipient. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |